Presentation Tips

Batching vs. Iterating: A Better Way to Build Slides

Jordan Turner
 | 
September 11, 2025
 | 
6
 min read
Batching vs. Iterating: A Better Way to Build SlidesBatching vs. Iterating: A Better Way to Build Slides
Table of Contents

Creating a great presentation can feel like a tedious task. Starting from a blank canvas often leads to wasted time, endless back-and-forth, and frustration as teams try to nail both the message and the design. Without a clear process, it’s easy to get stuck refining a few slides while the rest of the deck lags behind, or to rush through content only to realize late in the game that everything needs a redesign.

This is where batching and iterating come in. These two workflows offer a structured way to approach presentation building, helping teams move faster, stay aligned, and minimize last-minute chaos. Batching allows you to group similar tasks to maximize efficiency, while iterating helps you build in natural checkpoints for feedback and course correction. Together, they create a balance between speed and flexibility. When combined thoughtfully, they can transform how teams create and deliver presentations.

Batching vs. Iterating

Batching

Batching is about grouping similar tasks together for efficiency. You map out the content for every slide first, then move on to designing them all, and take a final pass at everything at the end. It’s an assembly-line approach: get all the words down, then make them beautiful.

When it works best:

  • Large, structured presentations (like quarterly business reviews)
  • When multiple stakeholders need to weigh in on messaging before design starts
  • When deadlines are tight and production needs to be streamlined

Iterating

Iterating takes the opposite approach. Instead of trying to finish the whole deck at once, you build a few slides, review them, revise, and repeat. This workflow is more like sculpting: you shape the presentation as you go.

When it works best:

  • Early-stage ideas that are still evolving
  • Smaller decks where feedback can be turned around quickly
  • Highly collaborative projects where design inspires content (and vice versa)

Choosing which approach is right for you

Batching offers maximum efficiency, a consistent look and feel, and makes it easier to hit deadlines—but the trade-off is that last-minute changes can be costly and time-consuming. Iterating, on the other hand, is flexible and highly responsive to feedback, allowing creativity to evolve naturally as the project progresses. The downside is that it carries a risk of scope creep and can drag on indefinitely if feedback loops aren’t carefully managed. In short, batching wins on speed, while iterating wins on adaptability. Most teams need both approaches, and relying exclusively on one can create unnecessary headaches.

Relying too heavily on batching can lead to expensive last-minute changes. Imagine completing 40 slides only to learn the key message shifted. That means reworking content and design for the entire deck, which is frustrating and costly.

On the flip side, iterating too much can lead to scope creep and time drain. Without clear checkpoints, teams risk polishing the same five slides for days while the rest of the deck never materializes.

The result? Delays, frustration, and a presentation that still feels unfinished at deadline.

The hybrid approach

The solution is a hybrid workflow: batching small groups of slides (3–5 at a time), then iterating within those groups before moving on.

This approach gives teams the speed of batching and working in focused chunks, with the adaptability of iterating, since you can make adjustments before too much work has been done. It also builds in natural feedback loops, keeping everyone aligned without slowing the project down.

Implementation tips for a hybrid workflow in Beautiful.ai

One of the biggest advantages of using Beautiful.ai is that it removes the heavy lifting of slide design, making batching, iterating, and hybrid workflows far easier to implement. Instead of building every slide from scratch, teams can start with customizable templates that are already on-brand. These Smart Slide templates eliminate “blank slide syndrome” by giving everyone a strong starting point. Regardless of your process, the templates will automatically adapt as you add or edit content, making it easier to fine-tune your slides at any point in your flow. 

Because the slides are adaptive, teams can confidently batch content work first without worrying about layouts breaking later. You can draft several slides at a time, apply brand-approved themes with a single click, and let Beautiful.ai’s smart technology handle spacing, alignment, and consistency. When it’s time to iterate, editing is seamless. Slides update in real time, and design stays intact, so changes don’t slow down progress or require tedious reformatting.

Shared libraries take this to the next level by giving every team member access to the same bank of templates and slide designs. Whether someone is creating a new pitch deck or updating a quarterly review, they can grab what they need on demand, ensuring a consistent look and feel across the organization. Over time, these shared assets become a living system of ready-to-use content that saves hours of work on every project.

Beautiful.ai was built to support the presentation design process—batching, iterating, and everything in between. By combining adaptive slides, collaborative features, and reusable team templates, it enables teams to work faster, stay flexible, and produce professional decks without the unnecessary bottlenecks. 

Jordan Turner

Jordan Turner

Jordan is a Bay Area writer, social media manager, and content strategist.

By clicking 'Accept,' you consent to cookies that enhance your experience, personalize ads, and analyze site usage. See our Privacy Policy.